Paste a post. Get the receipts.
Perclaim reads a social-media post and checks it claim by claim against primary sources. The verdict is just an index — the sources are the real output.
Drop in a Facebook, X, Threads, or Instagram post — paste the text or upload a screenshot. Add the original link if you’d like it shown on the verdict page.
Perclaim breaks the post into its separate factual claims and checks each against primary sources — government data, transcripts, court filings, original reporting.
You get a verdict on a six-point scale, plus the sources behind it, the strongest objections to it, and a reply you can paste back. When something can’t be verified, it says so.
- TRUESupported by primary sources.
- MOSTLY TRUEMostly supported; minor inaccuracies.
- MIXEDPartially supported; framing or numbers off.
- MISLEADINGTechnically true but missing decisive context.
- MOSTLY FALSEMostly contradicted; partial truth.
- FALSEContradicted by primary sources.
- OPINIONValue judgment, not a factual claim.
- UNVERIFIABLENo reliable source either way.
- OUTDATEDWas accurate once, but later events have overtaken it.
Every claim also carries a confidence level — how sure the check is, separate from the verdict itself.
- HIGHMultiple sources directly confirm the finding.
- MEDIUMSources partly support it; some judgment involved.
- LOWCouldn’t find sources to settle it either way.
When a poster is sharing someone else’s claim, Perclaim notes how they’re framing it.
- ENDORSEMENTSharing someone else’s claim approvingly.
- CRITIQUESharing a claim to mock or condemn it.
Perclaim is AI-assisted, not journalism, and it can be wrong. That’s why the sources are always shown — so you can verify before you rely on it. When it can’t confirm something, it says “unverifiable” rather than guessing.
Try it on the next post that gives you pause.
RUN YOUR FIRST CHECK →FOREVER FREE — NO TRIAL CLOCK