Check the post,
before you reply.
Paste the text or upload a screenshot. Perclaim grades every claim against primary sources and writes you a reply you can send.
Paste the post.
Text, screenshot, or both. Add the original link if you’d like it shown on the verdict page.
Each claim gets a verdict.
We split the post into individual claims, grade each one against primary sources, and give the post an overall verdict.
Reply with sources.
A suggested reply for the post — and one for each claim — every reply with a citable URL you can attach.
A viral post about artificial kidneys.
VERDICTThere is real research on making kidneys more ABO-compatible, including enzymatic work and early human testing, but not a proven universal artificial kidney that works with any blood type. The post greatly overstates the maturity and scope of the science.
[c] MOSTLY_FALSE — There’s promising research on making kidneys more blood-type compatible, but no evidence yet of a universally compatible artificial kidney in routine use. The post overstates early experimental work as a finished breakthrough. [perclaim.com/v/ck_c0i8lkzo]
The new kidneys are designed to work seamlessly with any blood type, eliminating compatibility issues in transplants.
Blood type compatibility remains a real transplant issue, and current work is aimed at overcoming or reducing that barrier rather than eliminating it completely. The available evidence describes experimental approaches and early-stage results, not seamless universal compatibility.
This breakthrough could dramatically reduce wait times and rejection risks for patients needing kidney transplants.
The general idea is plausible: better compatibility could help expand donor options and reduce delays. But the post presents that as if a breakthrough is already in routine real-world use, which the available evidence does not support.